Over the past few years, much has been said and written about the post-truth nature of our world. We’ve dissected and analyzed the problem from various vantage points. After much handwringing, finger-pointing, and bemoaning of the end of democracy, fact-checking was anointed the primary antidote. We patted ourselves on our backs for solving a hard problem.
But not much has changed with the post-truthiness of the world. We are, it appears, at an impasse, because who will bell the cat? Who will take on the responsibility of fact-checking? But more importantly, who do we trust to do the job? Car Hood Liner Material
In 2023, we will see a new set of challengers attempting to bell the cat. We’ll witness the rise of independent, technology-driven fact-checking at scale. (Fingers crossed.)
These new efforts will build on the foundation laid down by the numerous fact-checking outfits already doing commendable and laudable work. They’ll continue to rely on and take inspiration from the mainstays — the consortiums of fact-checkers, ethical codes governing the practice, and the generally accepted taxonomy for facts.
This new breed of fact-checkers will set themselves apart by excelling where the old ones faltered, in achieving the trifecta of trustworthiness, scale, and sustainable financing.
Most fact-checking operations are part of or have close ties to larger media ventures. Therein lies the problem of trust: When trust in media is at historical lows, how can you build trust in facts as determined by the same media brands?
In a world where the lines between objective facts and subjective opinions are blurry, it’s increasingly difficult to prove non-partisanship. Facts are by nature tribal. A sense of shared reality is the glue that holds together social groups; one’s beliefs, masquerading as facts, become part of one’s social identity. Anything that threatens that identity is deemed an outsider — a partisan hack job that should not be trusted.
For a fact-checking effort to gain trust, the arbiters of truth cannot also be its distributors. Journalism will have to rely on third-party fact-checkers.
Fact-checking as it’s done today relies heavily on the expertise of trained professionals. It’s a time-consuming manual process.
Facts are, among other things, temporal and geographical. The veracity of the statement “It’s raining” depends on when and where it’s said. These are only some of the many challenges that make fact-checking extremely complex to automate.
To keep up with the rate of generation and circulation of mis/dis/mal-information, it’s imperative to be able to scale up fact-checking. And that means more automation, more machine-aided human-in-the-loop decision-making. It also means more well-designed, well-sourced, and frequently updated knowledge graphs.
The financial incentives for separating the signals from the noise are misaligned. Some skepticism would not be misplaced when expecting a social media site that profits (at least in the short term) from the virality of a fake account to police the account effectively.
Today, fact-checking, when not part of a media organization, usually takes the form of nonprofits relying on grants or exists as a line item in the CSR efforts of large corporations.
As we’ve learned painfully time and again in journalism, any effort that cannot sustain itself financially will be left by the wayside at the first sign of economic trouble. It’s therefore important for fact-checking to be a revenue center and not just a cost or a write-off.
Information disorder is an intractably large problem for any one institution to solve or address by itself. It will take many attempts, missteps, and capital disasters before we arrive at a working solution.
And when we do, the new crop of fact-checkers will most likely be venture-funded independent entities where the primary product or service offering is fact-checking powered by technology. These will be systems that can peek into the walled gardens of social media to identify harmful narratives. (While we’re at it, I hope 2023 will also be the year the walls come down and walled gardens of social media become more open.) They will not be monopolies but a group of agencies working in tandem, not unlike how credit scores work today. They will work closely with journalism and other civic institutions. They will operate behind the scenes away from the spotlight. And once again, our shared sense of reality will become less fragmented.
It will also throw up a new set of challenges around the regulation of these agencies, the structuring of capital to maintain church-and-state separation between funders and facts, and more. But that’s for another day and another year.
Kavya Sukumar is a developer-journalist who leads technology and media investment at Lightrock India.
Kavya Sukumar is a developer-journalist who leads technology and media investment at Lightrock India.
Over the past few years, much has been said and written about the post-truth nature of our world. We’ve dissected and analyzed the problem from various vantage points. After much handwringing, finger-pointing, and bemoaning of the end of democracy, fact-checking was anointed the primary antidote. We patted ourselves on our backs for solving a hard problem.
But not much has changed with the post-truthiness of the world. We are, it appears, at an impasse, because who will bell the cat? Who will take on the responsibility of fact-checking? But more importantly, who do we trust to do the job?
In 2023, we will see a new set of challengers attempting to bell the cat. We’ll witness the rise of independent, technology-driven fact-checking at scale. (Fingers crossed.)
These new efforts will build on the foundation laid down by the numerous fact-checking outfits already doing commendable and laudable work. They’ll continue to rely on and take inspiration from the mainstays — the consortiums of fact-checkers, ethical codes governing the practice, and the generally accepted taxonomy for facts.
This new breed of fact-checkers will set themselves apart by excelling where the old ones faltered, in achieving the trifecta of trustworthiness, scale, and sustainable financing.
Most fact-checking operations are part of or have close ties to larger media ventures. Therein lies the problem of trust: When trust in media is at historical lows, how can you build trust in facts as determined by the same media brands?
In a world where the lines between objective facts and subjective opinions are blurry, it’s increasingly difficult to prove non-partisanship. Facts are by nature tribal. A sense of shared reality is the glue that holds together social groups; one’s beliefs, masquerading as facts, become part of one’s social identity. Anything that threatens that identity is deemed an outsider — a partisan hack job that should not be trusted.
For a fact-checking effort to gain trust, the arbiters of truth cannot also be its distributors. Journalism will have to rely on third-party fact-checkers.
Fact-checking as it’s done today relies heavily on the expertise of trained professionals. It’s a time-consuming manual process.
Facts are, among other things, temporal and geographical. The veracity of the statement “It’s raining” depends on when and where it’s said. These are only some of the many challenges that make fact-checking extremely complex to automate.
To keep up with the rate of generation and circulation of mis/dis/mal-information, it’s imperative to be able to scale up fact-checking. And that means more automation, more machine-aided human-in-the-loop decision-making. It also means more well-designed, well-sourced, and frequently updated knowledge graphs.
The financial incentives for separating the signals from the noise are misaligned. Some skepticism would not be misplaced when expecting a social media site that profits (at least in the short term) from the virality of a fake account to police the account effectively.
Today, fact-checking, when not part of a media organization, usually takes the form of nonprofits relying on grants or exists as a line item in the CSR efforts of large corporations.
As we’ve learned painfully time and again in journalism, any effort that cannot sustain itself financially will be left by the wayside at the first sign of economic trouble. It’s therefore important for fact-checking to be a revenue center and not just a cost or a write-off.
Information disorder is an intractably large problem for any one institution to solve or address by itself. It will take many attempts, missteps, and capital disasters before we arrive at a working solution.
And when we do, the new crop of fact-checkers will most likely be venture-funded independent entities where the primary product or service offering is fact-checking powered by technology. These will be systems that can peek into the walled gardens of social media to identify harmful narratives. (While we’re at it, I hope 2023 will also be the year the walls come down and walled gardens of social media become more open.) They will not be monopolies but a group of agencies working in tandem, not unlike how credit scores work today. They will work closely with journalism and other civic institutions. They will operate behind the scenes away from the spotlight. And once again, our shared sense of reality will become less fragmented.
It will also throw up a new set of challenges around the regulation of these agencies, the structuring of capital to maintain church-and-state separation between funders and facts, and more. But that’s for another day and another year.
Kavya Sukumar is a developer-journalist who leads technology and media investment at Lightrock India.
Kavya Sukumar is a developer-journalist who leads technology and media investment at Lightrock India.
Bill Grueskin Local news will come to rely on AI
J. Siguru Wahutu American journalism reckons with its colonialist tendencies
Eric Ulken Generative AI brings wrongness at scale
Jody Brannon We’ll embrace policy remedies
Sue Schardt Toward a new poetics of journalism
Jaden Amos TikTok personality journalists continue to rise
Janet Haven ChatGPT and the future of trust
Mario García More newsrooms go mobile-first
Sam Gregory Synthetic media forces us to understand how media gets made
Paul Cheung More news organizations will realize they are in the business of impact, not eyeballs
Matt Rasnic More newsroom workers turn to organized labor
Kaitlin C. Miller Harassment in journalism won’t get better, but we’ll talk about it more openly
Tre'vell Anderson Continued culpability in anti-trans campaigns
Kirstin McCudden We’ll codify protection of journalism and newsgathering
Nicholas Jackson There will be launches — and we’ll keep doing the work
Peter Sterne AI enters the newsroom
Andrew Donohue We’ll find out whether journalism can, indeed, save democracy
A.J. Bauer Covering the right wrong
Valérie Bélair-Gagnon Well-being will become a core tenet of journalism
Eric Holthaus As social media fragments, marginalized voices gain more power
Ariel Zirulnick Journalism doubles down on user needs
Mael Vallejo More threats to press freedom across the Americas
Jacob L. Nelson Despite it all, people will still want to be journalists
Al Lucca Digital news design gets interesting again
Alexandra Borchardt The year of the climate journalism strategy
David Cohn AI made this prediction
Julia Angwin Democracies will get serious about saving journalism
Anika Anand Independent news businesses lead the way on healthy work cultures
Danielle K. Brown and Kathleen Searles DEI efforts must consider mental health and online abuse
Brian Stelter Finding new ways to reach news avoiders
Bill Adair The year of the fact-check (no, really!)
Dana Lacey Tech will screw publishers over
Janelle Salanga Journalists work from a place of harm reduction
Larry Ryckman We’ll work together with our competitors
Cory Bergman The AI content flood
Mar Cabra The inevitable mental health revolution
Peter Bale Rising costs force more digital innovation
Eric Thurm Journalists think of themselves as workers
Sue Cross Thinking and acting collectively to save the news
Josh Schwartz The AI spammers are coming
Jenna Weiss-Berman The economic downturn benefits the podcasting industry. (No, really!)
Priyanjana Bengani Partisan local news networks will collaborate
Sarah Alvarez Dream bigger or lose out
Joanne McNeil Facebook and the media kiss and make up
Mauricio Cabrera It’s no longer about audiences, it’s about communities
Stefanie Murray The year U.S. media stops screwing around and becomes pro-democracy
Joni Deutsch Podcast collaboration — not competition — breeds excellence
Errin Haines Journalists on the campaign trail mend trust with the public
Karina Montoya More reporters on the antitrust beat
Jennifer Choi and Jonathan Jackson Funders finally bet on next-generation news entrepreneurs
Anita Varma Journalism prioritizes the basic need for survival
Lisa Heyamoto The independent news industry gets a roadmap to sustainability
Hillary Frey Death to the labor-intensive memo for prospective hires
Tamar Charney Flux is the new stability
Cassandra Etienne Local news fellowships will help fight newsroom inequities
Richard Tofel The press might get better at vetting presidential candidates
Ryan Gantz “I’m sorry, but I’m a large language model”
Elite Truong In platform collapse, an opportunity for community
Ayala Panievsky It’s time for PR for journalism
Burt Herman The year AI truly arrives — and with it the reckoning
Dannagal G. Young Stop rewarding elite performances of identity threat
Emily Nonko Incarcerated reporters get more bylines
Doris Truong Workers demand to be paid what the job is worth
Susan Chira Equipping local journalism
Alan Henry A reckoning with why trust in news is so low
Rodney Gibbs Recalibrating how we work apart
Esther Kezia Thorpe Subscription pressures force product innovation
Jesse Holcomb Buffeted, whipped, bullied, pulled
David Skok Renewed interest in human-powered reporting
Victor Pickard The year journalism and capitalism finally divorce
Snigdha Sur Newsrooms get nimble in a recession
Sumi Aggarwal Smart newsrooms will prioritize board development
Christina Shih Shared values move from nice-to-haves to essentials
Molly de Aguiar and Mandy Van Deven Narrative change trend brings new money to journalism
Wilson Liévano Diaspora journalism takes the next step
Upasna Gautam Technology that performs at the speed of news
Kavya Sukumar Belling the cat: The rise of independent fact-checking at scale
Taylor Lorenz The “creator economy” will be astroturfed
Jakob Moll Journalism startups will think beyond English
Jessica Maddox Journalists keep getting manipulated by internet culture
Kathy Lu We need emotionally agile newsroom leaders
John Davidow A year of intergenerational learning
Andrew Losowsky Journalism realizes the replacement for Twitter is not a new Twitter
Amethyst J. Davis The slight of the great contraction
Ryan Kellett Airline-like loyalty programs try to tie down news readers
Khushbu Shah Global reporting will suffer
Simon Galperin Philanthropy stops investing in corporate media
Surya Mattu Data journalists learn from photojournalists
Dominic-Madori Davis Everyone finally realizes the need for diverse voices in tech reporting
Michael W. Wagner The backlash against pro-democracy reporting is coming
Michael Schudson Journalism gets more and more difficult
Sarah Marshall A web channel strategy won’t be enough
Cindy Royal Yes, journalists should learn to code, but…
Eric Nuzum A focus on people instead of power
Pia Frey Publishers start polling their users at scale
Mariana Moura Santos A woman who speaks is a woman who changes the world
Masuma Ahuja Journalism starts working for and with its communities
Julia Beizer News fatigue shows us a clear path forward
Gordon Crovitz The year advertisers stop funding misinformation
Amy Schmitz Weiss Journalism education faces a crossroads
Shanté Cosme The answer to “quiet quitting” is radical empathy
Gina Chua The traditional story structure gets deconstructed
Alex Sujong Laughlin Credit where it’s due
Anna Nirmala News organizations get new structures
Jennifer Brandel AI couldn’t care less. Journalists will care more.
Don Day The news about the news is bad. I’m optimistic.
S. Mitra Kalita “Everything sucks. Good luck to you.”
Martina Efeyini Talk to Gen Z. They’re the experts of Gen Z.
Laxmi Parthasarathy Unlocking the silent demand for international journalism
Zizi Papacharissi Platforms are over
Rachel Glickhouse Humanizing newsrooms will be a badge of honor
Jarrad Henderson Video editing will help people understand the media they consume
Kaitlyn Wells We’ll prioritize media literacy for children
Delano Massey The industry shakes its imposter syndrome
Barbara Raab More journalism funders will take more risks
Basile Simon Towards supporting criminal accountability
Nicholas Diakopoulos Journalists productively harness generative AI tools
Sam Guzik AI will start fact-checking. We may not like the results.
Nikki Usher This is the year of the RSS reader. (Really!)
Brian Moritz Rebuilding the news bundle
AX Mina Journalism in a time of permacrisis
Johannes Klingebiel The innovation team, R.I.P.
Juleyka Lantigua Newsrooms recognize women of color as the canaries in the coal mine
Cari Nazeer and Emily Goligoski News organizations step up their support for caregivers
Mary Walter-Brown and Tristan Loper Mission-driven metrics become our North Star
Megan Lucero and Shirish Kulkarni The future of journalism is not you
Tim Carmody Newsletter writers need a new ethics
Daniel Trielli Trust in news will continue to fall. Just look at Brazil.
Kerri Hoffman Podcasting goes local
Joe Amditis AI throws a lifeline to local publishers
Parker Molloy We’ll reach new heights of moral panic
Laura E. Davis The year we embrace the robots — and ourselves
Emma Carew Grovum The year to resist forgetting about diversity
Alex Perry New paths to transparency without Twitter
Jim Friedlich Local journalism steps up to the challenge of civic coverage
Jonas Kaiser Rejecting the “free speech” frame
Felicitas Carrique and Becca Aaronson News product goes from trend to standard
Alexandra Svokos Working harder to reach audiences where they are
Elizabeth Bramson-Boudreau More of the same
Nicholas Thompson The year AI actually changes the media business
Moreno Cruz Osório Brazilian journalism turns wounds into action
Leezel Tanglao Community partnerships drive better reporting
Francesco Zaffarano There is no end of “social media”
Sarah Stonbely Growth in public funding for news and information at the state and local levels
Walter Frick Journalists wake up to the power of prediction markets
Ryan Nave Citizen journalism, but make it equitable
Jim VandeHei There is no “peak newsletter”
Sarabeth Berman Nonprofit local news shows that it can scale
Anthony Nadler Confronting media gerrymandering
Jessica Clark Open discourse retrenches
Christoph Mergerson The rot at the core of the news business
Joshua P. Darr Local to live, wire to wither
Ståle Grut Your newsroom experiences a Midjourney-gate, too
Raney Aronson-Rath Journalists will band together to fight intimidation
Gabe Schneider Well-funded journalism leaders stop making disparate pay
Ben Werdmuller The internet is up for grabs again
Sue Robinson Engagement journalism will have to confront a tougher reality
To promote and elevate the standards of journalism
Covering thought leadership in journalism
Pushing to the future of journalism
Exploring the art and craft of story
The Nieman Journalism Lab is a collaborative attempt to figure out how quality journalism can survive and thrive in the Internet age.
composites It’s a project of the Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard University.